Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:08:11 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Juan Manuel Guerrero <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: conversion specifiers and _doprnt
In-Reply-To:	<C1E45A8735D@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020919120639.867A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:

> The difference between f and F is that:
>   f prints: inf or infinity and nan.
>   F prints: INF or INFINITY and NAN.

Ah, yes.

> IIRC, libc implementation always prints NaN and Inf.

Yes.  A change to that would require a simultaneous change to the Cygnus 
test suite in djtstNNN.zip, though.

> As Charles Sandman suggested some time ago, I have commented out (#if 0)
> the O conversion specifier from the sources and retained unchanged everything
> else to keep BORLAND/MSC compatibility.

Personally, I'd leave O alone.  I don't like removing existing 
functionality without a very good reason.

- Raw text -