Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/11/09/21:12:27
Orlando Andico <orly AT gibson DOT eee DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph> wrote:
>Yes, that may be so.. :)
>I have all the technical documentation for QNX and it is a very impressive
>achievement; it even has an OpenLook-like GUI which can run in less than
>1meg of RAM, it's POSIX-compliant, and can run X Windows.
That's how an OS should be!
>But: and this is a very large "but"...
>Does anyone know the COST of QNX? it's in the several-hundreds of US$
>range. Now if all you're concerned about is saving $$$ by saving memory,
>QNX, even though it has a very small memory footprint, is a net loss.
Precisely. Commercialism killing something decent. Better than
commercialism pushing crap, though, like Microsoft!
>Sure, I need 16MB to run Linux decently with X Windows, true. But how much
>does 16MB of RAM cost? around US$ 100 the last time I checked. So, it's
>cheaper to just buy tons of memory than scrounge around for little scraps
>with a small OS.
Running QNX in that 16Mb would be pleasant indeed, tho!
ABW
--
"Simply drag your mother in law's cellphone number from the
Address Book to the Laser Satellite icon, and the Targeting
Wizard will locate her. Then follow the onscreen prompts for
gigawattage and dispersion pattern..."
(Windows for Early Warning and Defence User's manual P385)
Alaric B. Williams Internet : alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
<A HREF="http://www.abwillms.demon.co.uk/">Hello :-)</A>
- Raw text -