Mail Archives: djgpp/1996/11/24/14:03:15
On 21 Nov 96 at 8:42, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > This is true, but leaving the modified djgpp.lnk should do no harm,
>
> You don't know that, certainly not for any arbitrary package that
> replaces a standard DJGPP file (which IMHO is A Bad Thing in the first
> place) with its customized thing.
I do know that it /should/ do no harm! On that thread, what would be
the Good way of changing the linker settings? I didn't think there
was a gcc switch to override the use of djgpp.djl, ie use a seperate
libhw.djl?
Regards,
ABW
--
Governments are merely protection rackets with good images.
Alaric B. Williams Internet : alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
<A HREF="http://www.abwillms.demon.co.uk/">http://www.abwillms.demon.co.uk/</A>
- Raw text -