Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/01/16/01:46:47
On Wed, 15 Jan 1997, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> I agree 80% with Eli, if you want a full configurable thing go for Emacs, you
Just curious: would you care to tell what are the 20% that you disagree?
> 3) Time: I don't know how many people made Emacs (or a similar thing)
I estimate that Emacs gets contributions from about two dozen people who
constantly add features, plus a lot of others who do that occasionally.
That's the primary reason that no other editor could ever beat Emacs in
functionality: everything you can possibly think of is already there (or
will be in the next release).
- Raw text -