ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 16 Jan 1997 08:40:42 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | Alexander Lehmann <lehmann AT mathematik DOT th-darmstadt DOT de> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Why two identical typedef are considered an error in DJGPP? |
In-Reply-To: | <5bh88d$79r@rs18.hrz.th-darmstadt.de> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.970116083846.16632F-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On 15 Jan 1997, Alexander Lehmann wrote: > Actually, I think this is correct in ANSI, maybe other compilers have > `softened' the definition a bit (which causes highly unportable > programs, of course). No, the real problem (AFAIK) is that most of the other compilers just don't warn about identical definitions, unless you turn on an option that makes them more touchy. GCC's default diagnostics is better, that's all.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |