Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/01/16/14:16:11
Hi Eli:
> > I agree 80% with Eli, if you want a full configurable thing go for Emacs, you
> Just curious: would you care to tell what are the 20% that you disagree?
Well, Robert allready have a configuration system through enviroment variables,
and I guess isn't much difficult make it work, but with some friendly
interface, that makes configurable the "make" of RHIDE. I'll include some
configurable syntax highlight and scripting (in some month). So as you can see
I can't say that I think that RHIDE must be static, but I agree that not so
configurable as Emacs, I don't plan to write a SETLisp interpreter ;-).
> > 3) Time: I don't know how many people made Emacs (or a similar thing)
> I estimate that Emacs gets contributions from about two dozen people who
> constantly add features, plus a lot of others who do that occasionally.
> That's the primary reason that no other editor could ever beat Emacs in
> functionality: everything you can possibly think of is already there (or
> will be in the next release).
Just what I guessed.
SET
--------------- 0 --------------------------------
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET).
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013
- Raw text -