ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2001 21:12:07 +0200 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Cc: | jbailey8 AT triad DOT rr DOT com, eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
Subject: | Re: more info |
Message-ID: | <20010626211207.A1193@lauras.lt> |
References: | <3 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 20010625223038 DOT 007c4480 AT pop-server DOT triad DOT rr DOT com> <3B382573 DOT 4F9FDE25 AT falconsoft DOT be> <7458-Tue26Jun2001173651+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B38A4B1 DOT 67C2F96F AT falconsoft DOT be> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <3B38A4B1.67C2F96F@falconsoft.be> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> If xgcc is trying to create ./specs through renaming and it's on WinME, > it might > be a rename() issue; other than that, I'd consider the possibility of > xgcc trying > to run ./specs most likely. Yes. It is created like ./xgcc -blah -blah -dumpspecs > tmp-specs mv tmp-specs specs That's why I've asked for output of these commands in my other mail. Laurynas
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |