Mail Archives: djgpp/2004/10/24/04:00:09
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>From: "one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com" <one2001boy AT yahoo DOT com>
>>Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:33:33 GMT
>>
>>under Windows XP in directory C:\windows\system32, I
>>have 2558 File(s).
>>
>>run ls -F, I wait for 16 seconds, and then screen start to display
>>the files and directories.
>
>
> Can you tell how much time it takes on the same machine, and in the
> same directory, to run "ls" (without the -F option)?
It took 4 seconds to display all. The file starts to display right after
you type dir.
>
> The reason I'm asking this is because on XP, whenever any DOS program
> is run, Windows needs to start a DOS emulation, load and process the
> AUTOEXEC.NT file, and do other time-consuming chores. That makes any
> DJGPP program look generally sluggish on XP.
>
>
>>The computer I am running is Pentium 4, 3.0 Ghz, with 512 Meg.
>
>
> I tried this on a laptop with 993-MHz Pentium III and 256 MB of main
> memory, running XP SP1a, and got the following responses: "ls -F"
> starts displaying after 10 seconds when I run it on WINDOWS\SYSTEM32
> directory first time, and after only 3 seconds when I run it on the
> same directory afterwards (because the directory contents is already
> in the Windows disk cache).
Right.
> Just "ls" starts displaying after 1
> second. This system has 1844 files (including 41 subdirectories) in
> its WINDOWS\SYSTEM32 directory.
>
> The same "ls -F" command on a 450-MHz box running Windows 98 (1151
> files in the WINDOWS\SYSTEM directory) takes 7 seconds.
>
> So it sounds like the CPU speed is not important here. What matters
> is the file-system efficiency.
>
> Also, the fact that "ls -F" takes a while in such a huge directory is
> not really news to me. We are lucky such directories are rare.
I guess not all people will always use ls -F.
>
> Bottom line, I suggest to use "ls --color" to find out file
> attributes. It is faster because it only looks at the files'
> file-name extensions, but does not read the first few bytes to look
> for the magic signature if the extension does not reveal the file's
> type. That will miss a few rare executable files if the LS_COLORS
> variable doesn't catch them.
>
This is a nice try. Thank you.
- Raw text -