ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2011/02/09/20:45:17

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: VIRTUAL BOX and my GAME - Mr Rod Pemberton
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 17:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <af0d0aa4-7793-443d-83db-7697477d19e5@p16g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
References: <125997 DOT 8962 DOT qm AT web45113 DOT mail DOT sp1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <iipaa4$nu1$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org>
<xnfwrzpw1i DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com> <iirko2$rtk$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org> <83mxm6s2h9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297301555 26239 127.0.0.1 (10 Feb 2011 01:32:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:32:35 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: p16g2000vbs.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 4171
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Feb 8, 2:20=A0pm, Eli Zaretskii <e DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
> > From: "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h DOT  DOT  DOT  AT notreplytome DOT cmm>
> > Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:45:25 -0500
> > Bytes: 3360
>
> > For all practical purposes, DJGPP is dead. =A0It's frozen in time. =A0I=
t
> > tried to move to XP, sort of... =A0It hasn't, yet... =A0That's still in
> > Beta. =A07 years of Beta...
>
> I don't know what you are talking about. =A0DJGPP v2.03 works very well
> on XP, and is rock solid there. =A0I'm using it for the last 7 years to
> maintain the DJGPP port of Emacs. =A0There's no need whatsoever to go to
> the beta-quality v2.04 (which, I hear, is also much more stable than
> some release-quality packages out there).

(corrections welcome, obviously Eli knows 1000x more about this than I
do)

Only with patchlevel 2 (backported from 2.04?) did 2.03 (circa 2000)
become "stable" on Win2k/XP, thanks to CWS' workarounds (leaking
selectors?). And DJGPP still can't even pretend to be at the same
level of functionality as on Win9x. Various things broke, gfx support
is weaker, etc. But we grudgingly accept it because XP is more stable
(well, and we don't have much choice anyways, it's the popular OS. Or
was.)

Besides, Win9x won't barely run, if at all, on modern hardware and
isn't even half as well supported, in apps or drivers, as XP. Even
Win2k is too old for most developers. So those are even more difficult
options.

XP came out in (late?) 2001. Since this was the first NT version meant
for home users, they declared (stand-alone) DOS dead. SP2 came out in
2004 (luckily not "yet another" OS release). SP3 is about a year or so
old. MS calls XP "old" and "deprecated". They don't sell it on new
machines anymore. Clearly they aren't going to fix all our NTVDM woes.
XP Mode (via VPC) for Win 7 (Business, Enterprise, Ultimate only)
exists as optional download, but it's not meant (or allowed) for home
users. Sure, XP works "fairly" well for DJGPP, or at least better than
Win2k3, Vista, 7, 64-bit (nada), but that's not really saying much.
Oh, and VS2010's runtime doesn't even support older XP versions
anymore. Software developers barely still support XP, and obviously
testing/support for it is seriously waning (ahem, McAfee). In other
words, even if I (barely) like XP and it works, I can't rely on it
anymore. Extended support (or whatever) ends somewhere around 2014.
Then even XP will truly be dead.  :-(

P.S. The changes in 2.04 were pretty much CWS' work (right??). He's
been too busy to finish it. Perhaps he will one day, but he will
probably need all our help. Better support for 4 GB files, better
memory management (??), symlinks, etc. I actually (barely) prefer it
and use it though admittedly 2.03p2 is "close enough" for most things.
Yeah, I'm not ready to give up on DJGPP yet. It's "good enough" for my
DOS needs.   :-)

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019