X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 20:27:12 +0300
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU Emacs 23.3 uploaded
In-reply-to:	<80c58cc8-0175-4094-b0be-70ff8cb8c860@z7g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
X-012-Sender:	halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id:	<83boz7hlsf.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<201104251501 DOT p3PF1pXS011872 AT delorie DOT com> <ipeqs4$5sb$1 AT news DOT onet DOT pl> <8339l07wbn DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <bc8ba0ee-3b1d-4a2d-81f7-e00bede5a926 AT z7g2000prh DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83zkmvggv4 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <a247b893-6e70-4901-9210-6f158cde30c7 AT x1g2000yqb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <6621d833-5d9a-4f43-8b36-1fe53191e293 AT d26g2000prn DOT googlegroups DOT com> <E1QKNyW-0002Ko-SC AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> <80c58cc8-0175-4094-b0be-70ff8cb8c860 AT z7g2000prh DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 05:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > Can you post the traceback, even if it's just numerical addresses?
> 
> No because there is no traceback. I didn't mean it "crashes", it may
> not at all, but it definitely closes the whole "DOS in a box" terminal
> window, which means something somewhere is aborting it.

Okay.  If you have a few moments to spare, please try this:

  . Try just loading sh-script (M-x load-library RET sh-script RET)
    and see if that alone crashes DOSEMU.

  . Disable font-lock globally (M-x global-font-lock-mode RET) before
    typing `e' on the .sh file, and see if DOSEMU still crashes.

  . If both of the two previous items didn't crash, enable font-lock
    and try bisecting that .sh file until you find which part causes
    the crash.  (I assume that font-lock in other modes doesn't cause
    a crash, so font-lock by itself is not the reason.)

- Raw text -