X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gcc difficulties on MSDOS 6.22 with LFN driver installed
Date:	Sat, 3 Sep 2011 14:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<306fc401-ad43-4c8c-9e86-382f90e32110@p10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References:	<201108310027 DOT 22056 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <E1Qye2f-0005Iu-TI AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org>
	<201108312117 DOT 54522 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <j3op85$567$1 AT speranza DOT aioe DOT org>
	<038ae4ff-44f2-4ad2-b806-a6ed9b6085a2 AT o9g2000vbo DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83zkincty6 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <e5b1540d-525e-48b9-9b15-59e9ba823a23 AT s2g2000vby DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vA1fwBnmJh-L0g4Rw+BdoSD4VBXGd2WP-W5dws7KGFA-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <83pqjiuccr DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	95.208.11.28
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1315083744 12914 127.0.0.1 (3 Sep 2011 21:02:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sat, 3 Sep 2011 21:02:24 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	p10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=95.208.11.28; posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client:	true
X-Google-Header-Order:	HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0,gzip(gfe)
Bytes:	2673
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p83LF24X000871
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 2 Sep., 18:40, Eli Zaretskii <e DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:25:48 +0300
> > From: Ozkan Sezer <seze DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com>
>
> > Something like the following then?  (Very quick+dirty patch, I know.)
>
> Yes, thanks.  Although it would be better to know whether DOSLFN
> returns -1 in offset 0x24 or non-zero in offset 0x20, and have a more
> fine-grain recovery here.
>
> > I also wonder whether fchmod() and/or fstat() are affected by this
> > lfn issue...
>
> Juan, can you test that?

I have found my old FreeDOS CD and installed DOSLFN 0.40c.
With this driver everthing works on MSDOS.  Stepping into
the filelength() code shows that the 0.40e version does
not set the CF when it returns from 0x71A6 call while 0.40c
does so that it jumps directly into the 0x4201 code instead
of returning an EOVERFLOW.
Neitherless, the points that were pointed out by Charles
Sandmann in
http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2011/09/02/23:45:11
still are open.  Some fix for that issue would be nice.

Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -