X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=bGfzgAiu0FpJRNCSJHU5splxBnNeFtn7WlqhZWjfSME=;
	b=GMRedR1NGmQjbvfEILYd454egOFmfNFnbQ7N75W7lkU0uwVi9KvgB1AcsxaKrfKE0W
	xWJ1vhLBz/Fpfla+K69tJwLKuOeBK4M7tqFNpOJUZXy8RY3QM7SS/4vHv1W3w7U1LvFn
	C8IkF6cSuYSyK0yMl8sQ5wc/S9IxJoKBvRGlE=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<ab129657-7f07-425e-861e-b4abeb0319e4@g31g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
References:	<201109171356 DOT 53360 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<CAA2C=vD-Lzrt2z=gkkQcrgmssdh6F7vgU_kwVgu6o9iPGykMJQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<2dc464f3-6f8c-4139-8dcb-0719e25116bf AT i39g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vAphY=pug=oSg-5Az05kZybY0NUYg6SS8d9xKL6f3AwRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<ab129657-7f07-425e-861e-b4abeb0319e4 AT g31g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:03:07 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vAZ0r0g55PpGpJWL3CMhAX7bqGFivdi6fY0NgjPjqwrVw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Isues concerning the INT 21 Windows95 - LONG FILENAME FUNCTIONS
	(0x71XX) implementation.
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8IL3Csu030571
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sep 17, 2:23 pm, Ozkan Sezer <seze DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rugxulo <rugx DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> > You mean Hammer of Thyrion? I assume this means you rebuilt it.
>>
>> >http://uhexen2.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> Yep. I'm the main developer of it.
>
> Ah, okay. Yeah, I've tested that off and on, at least the demo, for
> the past year or so. Works quite well. Nice work. (Though you're using
> old CWSDPMI versions, dunno why, latest is r7.)

I don't know how tested that one is, so I decided to
stay safe and use r5+latest updates to it

>
> EDIT: Actually, just upgraded from rc2 to rc5 (Win64) and played a bit
> and got a crash.   :->
>

Actually 1.5.0-final is about to be released in a day or
two.  For the packages intended for release, but see here:
http://uhexen2.sourceforge.net/tmp/

If you still have a crash, I'd like to have a detailed bug report
about it.

>> >> <rant>
>> >> With doslfn loaded, the hard disk scratching was unbearable to
>> >> hear. Living with conventional dos is a bliss..
>> >> </rant>
>
> Don't forget you can use a RAM disk.   ;-)
>

Heh. Well, without RAM disk and without DOSLFN it is just OK

--
O.S.

- Raw text -