X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Hammer of Thyrion (was Re: Isues concerning the INT 21 ...)
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	34
Message-ID:	<a9a46165-40d4-4cb4-8fa2-8930bbd5b3d2@o9g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
References:	<201109171356 DOT 53360 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <CAA2C=vD-Lzrt2z=gkkQcrgmssdh6F7vgU_kwVgu6o9iPGykMJQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<2dc464f3-6f8c-4139-8dcb-0719e25116bf AT i39g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vAphY=pug=oSg-5Az05kZybY0NUYg6SS8d9xKL6f3AwRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<ab129657-7f07-425e-861e-b4abeb0319e4 AT g31g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> <CAA2C=vAZ0r0g55PpGpJWL3CMhAX7bqGFivdi6fY0NgjPjqwrVw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	65.13.115.246
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1316468976 1937 127.0.0.1 (19 Sep 2011 21:49:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	o9g2000vbo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client:	true
X-Google-Header-Order:	HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0.2,gzip(gfe)
Bytes:	2949
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8JM02cx024777
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Sep 19, 5:03 am, Ozkan Sezer <seze DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Rugxulo <rugx DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> > Ah, okay. Yeah, I've tested that off and on, at least the demo, for
> > the past year or so. Works quite well. Nice work. (Though you're using
> > old CWSDPMI versions, dunno why, latest is r7.)
>
> I don't know how tested that one is, so I decided to
> stay safe and use r5+latest updates to it

It's tested fairly well, and CWS considers it stable. DJ's Zip Picker
suggests it by default now, and I've been using it almost exclusively
without any issues. If you're worried, just try it and see. But it
should be okay.

> > EDIT: Actually, just upgraded from rc2 to rc5 (Win64) and played a bit
> > and got a crash.   :->
>
> Actually 1.5.0-final is about to be released in a day or
> two.  For the packages intended for release, but see here:http://uhexen2.sourceforge.net/tmp/
>
> If you still have a crash, I'd like to have a detailed bug report
> about it.

Well, I did another play-through of the demo (still with rc5), but I
couldn't reproduce it.

IIRC, I was on Win64, h2.exe, 800x600, Crusader, average (2/4)
difficulty, it just aborted when I went into one of the portals that
took me back to the start of the hub (beginning). Probably obscure and
not worth worrying about if it can't be reproduced.

- Raw text -