X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] gEDA WIKI missing a link for Win32 binary
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20120321124228.0fa8d5e2@svelte>
References:
	<CABVAnogE6s5RQ3gsgCBj+V9KG0YZMkWXspc7H02Pn3+vnELkRQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOuGh88DsjpRP7zBGxXMge4dE3GB9p7V+YuMtbYkLb3=8Kbjgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20120321124228 DOT 0fa8d5e2 AT svelte>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:06:44 +0100
Message-ID:	<1332364004.2535.11.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Evolution 2.32.3
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:42 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> 
> I cannot get gschem to work on Windows.
> 
> Some colleagues of mine are considering using either an expensive
> commercial EDA suite, or EAGLE, or possibly gEDA for some upcoming
> projects.

Do you really think they would use gschem when it runs fine on Windows?

It is my feeling that Windows people simple do not like the somewhat old
fashioned GTK look and feel of gschem/pcb, and the fact that there is no
integrated unit for schematic, pcb layout and simulation.

These free as beer DesignSpark seems to become more and more popular
now, beside KiCad.

There was recently a stupid poll in a german forum, of course very
arbitrary and biased. Right column is the number of 'users'...
 
http://www.mikrocontroller.net/topic/243262#2603191

- Raw text -