X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:01:35 -0700
From:	Colin D Bennett <colin AT gibibit DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Need some help with gsymcheck warning messages
Message-ID:	<20121008100135.1ba5e93c@svelte>
In-Reply-To:	<20121008163144.GA11303@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<5072321B DOT 5060406 AT twcny DOT rr DOT com>
	<20121008163144 DOT GA11303 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com
X-BWhitelist:	no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender:	(svelte) [65.61.115.34]:37387
X-Source-Auth:	colin AT gibibit DOT com
X-Email-Count:	1
X-Source-Cap:	c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:31:44 +0400
Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 09:53:31PM -0400, Tom, KC2ZAT wrote:
> ...
> > Checking: /home/kc2zat/Desktop/TQ3370-J4.sym
> > Warning: Found the same number in a pinnumber attribute and in
> > a net attribute [13]
> > Warning: Found the same number in a pinnumber attribute and in
> > a net attribute [17]
> > Warning: Found the same number in a pinnumber attribute and in
> > a net attribute [19]
> > Warning: Found the same number in a pinnumber attribute and in
> > a net attribute [25]
> > Warning: Found the same number in a pinnumber attribute and in
> > a net attribute [5]
> > 5 warnings found
> > No errors found
> > 
> > What I want to do is:
> > Assign the net "gnd" to pins 13, 17, and 25.
> > Assign the net "Vcc" to pin 19.
> > Assign the net "Vpp" to pin 5.
> > 
> > Searching the Internet turned up some hits but they seemed to
> > focus on a bug circa 2009.
> > I reviewed the Master Attribute list for pinnumber and net and
> > I did not see anything indicating some kind of conflict.  I
> > also reviewed the net= attribute mini-HOWTO and I didn't pick
> > up anything there that seemed wrong.
> ...
> 
> Don't worry. It's just a warning, not an error.
> As the comment in gsymcheck sources reads:
>   /* Check for all pins that are in both lists and print a
> warning. Sometimes this is useful and sometimes it's an error. */
> It means the lists of pinnumbers in pinnumber= and net=
> attributes. The net= attribute is mainly used when you want to
> omit some of pins on your symbol.

But won't it be unconventional and confusing, at the very least,
to have pins on the symbol that are also secretly connected to a
net?

I have seen symbols with hidden power/ground pins, and symbols with
all pins visible, but never one where visible pins have a hidden
connection to a net.

Regards,
Colin

- Raw text -