ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=google.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id | |
:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; | |
bh=MXNzbaZEUSDSPxAC8S6KMfdJIv+j6Z367Tx+4cD3Ee8=; | |
b=a4QIE7jo/3vZWbMIVuvhDBzQhIoJ8YS0PD2QTpF41AUq4Liqw9QrRu/s29DMbrjRxs | |
8AhFGduyfyGmIegX8mQWQphzs3LVXUhLqy/YcHy8dRlAjbh1A2UELtT5I1WtzZHR8+/p | |
ftl8AcsIfX7HsjN8gE0s+Yhb0Z+k3DVW/gnKhes+xUyaPu1dfgloicVUl1KZ+Cf6t6W8 | |
Wbir92Rv2OPOT26zLV1zmNanJKqkwZkuWbX6VZ5MjW889A8D3MQT7T41O15QLsJECIw6 | |
VmtL75uJPqlzlzalaVtLzxLOpKNSI9hgrF87tU5M00cyFLYQO5U3wtRTrFRo07w2efmS | |
dsWw== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.180.185.176 with SMTP id fd16mr19559685wic.31.1364953700540; |
Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:48:20 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <kjfqas$u7c$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <CACPio-58misa4nDUKcutj9KBwtgnLfwhJdd-yt8vq21sj0d_BA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAN0Jx-9Fx5HCuymYumKiRBuii7iU2ou3e7KYzdS9fO7LZPTSOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<kjfqas$u7c$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
Date: | Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:48:20 -0700 |
Message-ID: | <CAN0Jx-_Y0Fb3dACbT0H0mq3y45VORE7CPj7RgwMOHDyPxR0phg@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Footprints - mechanical pads |
From: | Russell Dill <Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Gm-Message-State: | ALoCoQnF92ZJHpZq/APyY2QTPERCiBN3KfUChQc5/TO5MgvHUadpE75tmH6OtuwU0JLFpRwpAhxb |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> wrote: > Russell Dill wrote: > >>> How should i handle pads which can optionally be connected to >>> ground? >> >> Just name them and you should be fine, no? >> > > If you connect GND to the pin without the pin mentioned in the > schematic, pcb will complain on the next "optimize rats". If you > mention the named pin in the schematic and tie it to GND, then pcb > will insist, you do indeed connect it to GND copper. Either way,the > connection is not quite optional. doh, somehow I misread the question completely. Ignore my response
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |