ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20151221203331.20837.qmail@stuge.se> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:33:31 +0100 |
From: | "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure? |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20151221030451 DOT 02399163eb3e40f21c622c41 AT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAOP4iL1PTdeCZdT+SthHwQtaxC4x06MbBQmxRcK3DZyQ-jfw=Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Until you nail down your foundation it wont do you any good to start > off building on it. I disagree. It's possible and good to start at arbitrary levels of abstraction and work in both directions. But what works for you works for you. :) Please help with describing the objects. //Peter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |