ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=9/xAPdrSd1kP41ShZZyXEWH9Aewb2pOB75NP+mSOBe4=; | |
b=uMcf/zDpzotBcfGkAuvUvcBUyx5V7eVvrTFfK4dunNznf5RXRnwUI4VbW61c9ydSpu | |
a/D1/OHLXc1S1sghxoVYFv0oQOO2u0EN0Zn3uCMNkC2jUl1Dj4/Dl3OSSeviyNWGn+HQ | |
Kt2PqjRVWBxZdYZ5L18te7jlOTgDN657CGjGce1py+dCenWicj5OJ18JzCByzIpcPijL | |
Pf9w9N0CZXfOLQFnRMc1zUwQ3kJPWUO5yuRhyRTKWAueCtImSI8hRb9FetNDKr5YxmmT | |
ShoSRd8Uwdde2zvyRK/HUQtgJqLvv3wFXSHQuMosM/3SDPfPbEIBeOe3ZWvC22ZEdWYc | |
un0g== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.202.169.138 with SMTP id s132mr9617537oie.101.1450791490000; |
Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:38:10 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <20151221023730.1cc8237648d37123bbc9fc5c@gmail.com> |
References: | <CAOFvGD6OiYxcGkOiQRVnvXW3TLs42bt7PE5Ot9s09hsukYicKA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<20151221023730 DOT 1cc8237648d37123bbc9fc5c AT gmail DOT com> | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:38:09 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAJXU7q-Z_gEYpQ=Q6GRXVCQcfPSfwu66DYnmqVptwaC-dB_Zkw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Proposing a New Hierarchical Data Structure? |
From: | "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 21 December 2015 at 01:37, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > * Ability to remove solder mask from arbitrary traces and areas I already implemented this (not in an ideal way, but as an extension of our existing layer system)... had thought it was upstream, but having just checked - no, it was waiting for further testing (which I'd say had happened now, since both myself, and the person I implemented it for, have been using it for some time now). I will try at some point (perhaps not until February or later), to untangle what patches I have ready for upstream, and get them pushed. Peter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |