ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=6gHMctL4rpTFyL6s9DltRQ1VNithdC8Kfz0po+8TJaE=; | |
b=jsrjpJzlEO5+nZrx5ZcYm+oQmFGP8iGLGjsVQGtCJDvmBJVdFIWu7vqA6B5sFNC+AJ | |
qTbeVgKYRnlFV30YRI0WdWdFCXaJm0sBgl8DwxDJdV7vFXyyA59996BXZhXrOwgt/+ra | |
JiZJoyuuQuxHjsAQW45mPh3wduHRvOOwOUfr8mUQx+DLSu8QXpO16TkxePPEwPSZECoa | |
NQNOyi7Ba73C/q90wDTaJ6M5pVADP7fo6jVdyxL+ARn6wMK9e5h2AC4H8hkqLeO5uk26 | |
ZzVJbgth1x9AuRVd2FPqSCaLT6mkk74sI5C1mAOrSAONNjHiFxh5b5Jw/6ZbaOtIcxrw | |
I+tQ== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.194.116.97 with SMTP id jv1mr32419163wjb.38.1450864698038; |
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 01:58:18 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <14F365D1-6794-427D-893B-BD972E81771E@sbcglobal.net> |
References: | <2F985E82-4EA8-42C9-9C50-99816BCE0BB4 AT sbcglobal DOT net> |
<CAMvDHVD7FBFuoMwhk3CXjKOOypDBXfmU9wvDTvQt8nvwoK2vZA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<14F365D1-6794-427D-893B-BD972E81771E AT sbcglobal DOT net> | |
Date: | Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:58:17 +0300 |
Message-ID: | <CAMvDHVCW5zcu=fo4dU=v-6MVrYXnDgx5nVRrYLToyDOLE_wVdQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Missing PO Files |
From: | "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id tBN9wND1008717 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 12/22/15, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: ... > Also, since there are multiple translation directories that need to be > maintained, would it be an improvement to move the PO folder to the root and > make one translation domain for the entire project? For example, all > programs and libraries in gEDA would just used the “geda” textdomain, > instead of separate ones, “geda-gschem,” “geda-gaf,” “geda-gattrib,” etc… I don't think so. In the state we have now, all programs have different options, menus, handles and so on. Why should we create such a mess with their translations in libgeda? As one of the translators, I'd prefer to have translation things as they are set up now. This allows me to translate first more important programs (gschem, gaf), then other utils, and thus makes my life easier :) OTOH, we have similar texts in various programs in geda-gaf because of using similar functions. IMO, we could move such common things (I mean functions) into libgeda, thus making our world simpler :) Cheers, Vladimir
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |