Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/12/28/15:28:54
John Doty wrote:
>
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com
> <mailto:mpdickens AT gmail DOT com>) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com
> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com
> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>> wrote:
>
>> Currently, badly needed development rarely occurs because those
>> people who are capable do not contribute because they are put off
>> by a few users who want NOTHING to change because it does not
>> fit their personal work flow.
>>
>
> There are really two projects here: The original gEDA (now confusingly
> called geda-gaf), and pcb. I think everyone agrees that pcb needs a
> lot of work. On the other hand, geda-gaf is matiure, effective, and
> easy to extend with scripting. Pcb development requires a great deal
> of collaboration. Geda-gaf development mostly does not, as anybody can
> write and publish a script.
>
> There would be much less controversy if these projects were separated.
> They represent radically different development patterns: conflating
> them causes much confusion and strife.
>
> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
>
> http://www.noqsi.com/
>
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com <mailto:jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
>
>
>
Hi John,
Please try to accept that two or more completely different projects can
share a single mailing list.
IMHO, there is no controversy, confusion or strife.
Kind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
- Raw text -