ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
John Doty: > On Dec 30, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > >>>> Neither gschem nor the schematic file format need any > >>>> modification to do this. It works nicely with SPICE. It’s a > >>>> downstream issue. > >> > >> Ok, that is one way to do it. I meant more that I wanted gschem to > >> be able to show alt. the formula or the result, i.e. with the > >> parameter/formula applied. > > > > An annotation mechanism may be a solution if could be made > > without adding confusion. I don't know what "annotation" means. > It’s tricky when you consider exporting hierarchical netlists > rather that flattening. The netlisters have to understand either: > > 1. Substitution of the parameters in a flat netlist. > > Or > > 2. Translation of the parameter syntax to that used downstream > in a hierarchical netlist. Wouldn't it suffice for the time being to simply generate a flat netlist. How many downstreams would understand a hierarchical netlist ? Yes, it wwould be nice, but if there is no support for any hierarchical things in downstream, there is no point at implementing it in netlist. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |