ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references | |
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to | |
:user-agent; | |
bh=TY380o+gC4ShDNj9O4m3K4hOm0URZJiN0Rxa2jcILjA=; | |
b=b3VeybwzoljnG0rnYxIOdyclDjitwE1NnTdQ3aqCSpf8ijLfqCNbSVixSHhEnrlvDz | |
BEN+sxl04MGS5QFx0FCWokCG33EF3DrM02O02nH6S487RAok5tGSI/L9gGKixiqnPD86 | |
aW2BpsSZi+POOA2eHr1sDOBe/5A0I4uL1EcZrV0lRoB/NTLcLu5I2tS9NwmJ/w07FyVM | |
f+Bi49xpSn+HzmwZew+FdOcV/t+49eMvXuRonvNB5VfqSqt3+gyvzEk2hJJzQq4RfszK | |
5QCxfZEJwA8ASIJphBG+DDw7b87TjvSYBbeohttqpFs4jwu+DeQ/g72jgLiwMuKFcMVk | |
5qGg== | |
X-Received: | by 10.25.41.193 with SMTP id p184mr7581428lfp.150.1451530043375; |
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:47:23 -0800 (PST) | |
Date: | Thu, 31 Dec 2015 05:47:21 +0300 |
From: | "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Re: Positive discussion topic thread |
Message-ID: | <20151231024721.GC19555@localhost.localdomain> |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <CAJXU7q8BsPKicvAgFvaigLBmT9CS3dJ_eFYR84mwWEg-=Vyg8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAJXU7q9RrJO8=rLG5rdnH_MHQRCO8oghxoGrsao7NfSMEPb+0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> | |
<201512310212 DOT tBV2C3MK029574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <201512310212.tBV2C3MK029574@envy.delorie.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 09:12:03PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > 1. Do we need to separate geda and pcb? > > Since most users use them together, no. > > > 2. Do we need a new name for pcb? > > How about "Ralph" ? :) nnnn I would suggest just 'geda-pcb'. This name wouldn't break our community and possibly wouldn't insult anybody. It wouldn't require any changes in our current documentation, either. Regards, Vladimir
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |