ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=6iDJErRrij1f7rdYY4rzYR4eMNq1peqi+SDIRDIiMyA=; | |
b=h0krEgehLsnBDP9iRumBveBt2mfc933HTLsYyatOXoOVCxnWGFOLEy241s70OFeRHP | |
C3Fn3c0HUITGQrItWGR4PrKT1JJhkIulqQkaG9Y56/wIPepiNog11kgleEkQUI4RWO/O | |
j2oDB8XdVHThMRl4pcov8uayrAhYOsGYy/BqlvM9vMjP9KiQEpGgaUPGeK6GvvsTCkzu | |
YD1SD1qXwbfamwSyAgihxM8v3Z0evvZAZw2Rljjmv72UZtw4ABlC0CXMNBGYpDK4PZyJ | |
5cseRDHVlCbwrdWIYNwwjncfNmv8maksOZyXmublSI4B5+Cr4vv42cJSzcZz2om2JlXM | |
zRvg== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.25.167.208 with SMTP id q199mr4454991lfe.61.1451550123217; |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:22:03 -0800 (PST) | |
In-Reply-To: | <20151231024721.GC19555@localhost.localdomain> |
References: | <CAJXU7q8BsPKicvAgFvaigLBmT9CS3dJ_eFYR84mwWEg-=Vyg8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAJXU7q9RrJO8=rLG5rdnH_MHQRCO8oghxoGrsao7NfSMEPb+0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20151230181538 DOT 32790b5b AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> | |
<201512310212 DOT tBV2C3MK029574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<20151231024721 DOT GC19555 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
Date: | Thu, 31 Dec 2015 16:22:03 +0800 |
Message-ID: | <CANDNR8qUCtttCn=euybPM0Zga+zv97Hxk5NO21HowX5p7pADAQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Re: Positive discussion topic thread |
From: | "Atommann (atommann AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
2015-12-31 10:47 GMT+08:00 Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>: > nnnn > I would suggest just 'geda-pcb'. This name wouldn't break our > community and possibly wouldn't insult anybody. It wouldn't > require any changes in our current documentation, either. How about a shorter version 'gpcb'? This follows the naming convention, like gschem, gnetlist, etc. -- Best regards, Atommann
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |