Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3419
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!news.kreonet.re.kr!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!news-relay.us.dell.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news1.i1.net!news1.inlink.com!usenet
From: mlinvle AT inlink DOT com (mlinvle)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: C++ code under djgpp.....
Date: 24 Nov 1995 19:56:47 GMT
Organization: Inlink
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
References: <494jdf$alp AT news1 DOT inlink DOT com> <494l0g$se6 AT news DOT cea DOT fr>
Nntp-Posting-Host: slip11.inlink.com
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <494l0g$se6 AT news DOT cea DOT fr>, nicolas AT chouette DOT saclay DOT cea DOT fr6 says...
>
>Are you sure your C++ files have the .cc extension (gcc needs this
>extension to automaticly switch from C to C++).
>

Yes...one of the first things I noticed about the djgpp compiler...I'm sure 
there's more to it.  I have some other code that compiler under Turbo C/C++ 
3.0, but not Watcom 10.5!  I didn't think there was *that* much disparity 
among compilers, but I guess there is.  I assumed most would follow what 
Stroustrup laid out in his book....