X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
In-Reply-To: <200611070505.kA7552Do005456@delorie.com>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4  CCH5 September 12, 2005
Message-ID: <OF7A892BFF.358C2ED5-ON8725721F.0060CAF9-8725721F.00610C16@seagate.com>
From: Gordon DOT Schumacher AT seagate DOT com
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:40:02 -0700
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SV-GW1/Seagate Internet(Release 7.0.1 HF29|March 07, 2006) at
 11/07/2006 09:40:52 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Proofpoint-FWRule: outbound2
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=4.65.5446:2.3.11,1.2.37,4.0.164 definitions=2006-11-07_08:2006-11-04,2006-11-07,2006-11-07 signatures=0
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> wrote on Mon, 06 Nov 2006 13:42:43
-0500:

# Glad to hear it.  Please look closely at the problems with the
# existing malloc package, and my replacement nmalloc.  One of the
# problems is exposed by the evilalgo.c test.

I'll take a look - should I reference this list or DJ-Workers for
reference on this?

# My health prevents me from doing anything major at this point.  But
# if things get moving I shall try to attack the memalign
# (non-standard) problem again.  At one point I understood this was
# needed to handle the later gcc versions.

What do you mean by "later"?  I'm currently building my application
with gcc 4.1.0; perhaps I'm simply not exposing the issue?