X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Received: by 10.224.174.145 with SMTP id t17mr3776801qaz.4.1369225691382; Wed, 22 May 2013 05:28:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.84.137 with SMTP id z9mr157391oby.42.1369225691089; Wed, 22 May 2013 05:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 05:28:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.181.199.10; posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.181.199.10 References: <201304061704 DOT r36H4k48018021 AT delorie DOT com> <3728e704-b839-4ad6-998e-d3aab686b649 AT googlegroups DOT com> <12d60e38-9778-4463-b914-396c2a62273f AT googlegroups DOT com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <79342766-b269-46cb-837a-9d118f63752f@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.23.2 - stack size From: RayeR Injection-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:28:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Bytes: 1959 Lines: 7 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r4MCj24h024375 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk OK, understand. But even if we don't have ability of grow down stac it could be possible to allocate dynamic-sized block at startup. Eg. to set min and max limits where the current value could vary according to amount of available RAM. So e.g. under plain DOS where all belongs to us we could allocate, say, 10MB of 256MB, 20MB of 512MB... 40MB of 2GB for stack or so. Could be better that one fixed value for wide range HW from 386 with 4MB up to icore with 4GB... :)