X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 06:06:39 +0300
Message-Id: <83k22mzn0g.fsf@gnu.org>
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <euccrcFp8kqU1@mid.dfncis.de> (message from Hans-Bernhard
 =?utf-8?Q?Br=C3=B6ker?=
	on Wed, 2 Aug 2017 00:15:03 +0200)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.29 uploaded.
References: <201707301540 DOT v6UFecLb017840 AT delorie DOT com>
 <CAA2C=vBWY7HYeu+tdO=WYN=wEmWfhLXWgH-9PtSvZkMs54rs1Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <5980C3AA DOT 2080305 AT gmx DOT de> <euccrcFp8kqU1 AT mid DOT dfncis DOT de>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker AT t-online DOT de>
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 00:15:03 +0200
> 
> Am 01.08.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Juan Manuel Guerrero [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]:
> > I do not know who has decide decades ago to declare 
> > _doprnt in
> > stdio.h but now this declaration collides with the one from libiberty.
> 
> How come it suddenly collides now?
> 
> _doprint has been in libiberty for 16 years, and in both GCC and DJGPP 
> sources longer than that.  What change suddenly turned this friendly 
> coexistence into a collision?

My guess would be that the newer versions of GCC emit more paranoid
warnings, and AFAIR we build the library with -Werror.

But it would be good to see the error messages, indeed.  Apologies if
they were already posted up-thread and I missed that.