2nd perhaps you, Rugxulo, could upload somewhere my Mario game, so eve= ryone can see it, for though it is running from Windows XP (without music) = but I think it would be good that djgpp people knows it .... modestly I thi= nk it's good, mainly it took me 2 or 3 years working a few hours some = days .... then probably all members will be happier to help me with VBox

I wish those who are altered succed in calming down, and return to nor= mal way

thank you
Pablo

Asesinar y comer un perro o un gato es = lo mismo q hacerlo a una vaca, un pollo, un cerdo o un pez. El genocidio no= discrimina. No seas complice de genocidas. No seas genocida. En la vida ta= rde o temprano todo vuelve. No comas cadaveres. No seas necr=F3fago.=

--- El mar 8-feb-11, Rod Pemberton <do_not_have AT no= treplytome.cmm> escribi=F3:

De: Rod Pemberton <do_not_have AT notreplytome DOT cm= m>
Asunto: Re: VIRTUAL BOX and my GAME - Mr Rod Pemberton
Para: dj= gpp AT delorie DOT com
Fecha: martes, 8 de febrero de 2011, 14:45

"DJ Delorie" <dj= @delorie.com> wrote in message
news:xnfwrzpw1i DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com...
> "Rod = Pemberton" <do_not_have AT notreplytome DOT cmm> writes:
>
> > If so, i= t's likely the DJGPP email to Usenet gateway rejected.
>
> It d= id. No foul language here, please, we have minors using DJGPP.
>= ;

I'd respect that position, if I thought it were true. Howeve= r, this is
Usenet. It's not for children. It never has been.= Think of all the binary
alt.* groups. It wasn't 25 years ag= o. It still isn't today. I'm not aware
of ever seeing a post from a chi= ld.

The volume here is virtually non-existant. I'm surprisedcomp.os.msdos.djgpp didn't get itself on the recent Big-8 deletion list.&= nbsp; If
Andris Pavenis and Juan Manuel Guerrero hadn't been posting "AN= NOUNCE"
messages, I think this group might've failed the Big-8 stage 1 r= equirements.

This group is not a DJGPP forum, or Listserv that you c= ontrol DJ. You
could've made this group moderated, if you so wishe= d. You didn't. That's
your failure. You still can, but AISI = there is no point anymore. DJGPP's
time has past. Well, ther= e might be one point to moderation: Big-8 doesn't
delete moderated group= s. Or, two: you can block any words you don't like,
for any langua= ge.

DJGPP is not being used to code DOS, e.g., FreeDOS or DR-DOS.&nb= sp; It was being
used to code FreeDOS-32, but that's been stalled for 6 years now. AFAIK,
it's not being used to code new OSes, or = any major applications. DJGPP
hasn't progressed in the 6 or 7 year= s that I've been reading here. The
handful of serious users of DJG= PP stopped posting 3 to 4 years ago. I'd
guess that most moved on.= For all practical purposes, DJGPP is dead. It's
frozen in t= ime. It tried to move to XP, sort of... It hasn't, yet...
Th= at's still in Beta. 7 years of Beta... No demand? It has = yet to find
another OS to give it purpose, or something to give it life,= like a DOS
shell for Windows 7. I've repeatedly suggested two thi= ngs that could
breathe some life into DJGPP: GNU GLIBC, and recompiled v= 2.03 with 64-bit
support enabled. GLIBC would allow GNU tools on D= OS to just work. 64-bit
would allow current users to migrate from = 32-bit. They'll have to do so at
some point. I.e., you'll lose them. So, the void is/was being filled by
other compi= lers: Cygwin, Pelles C, LCC-Win32, LLVM, MinGW, etc. All the
recen= t x86 OS developers seem to be using Linux w/GNU GCC, or MASM.

R= od Pemberton