X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sIX8nGYCibKIacb2HKkue9eGHcnntdTsjWoy4Is0WZo=; b=v13uZ2zIIoDRTgAUTHSqvwztst5QMjy6TeMtwQQVZQmYwxVrJgy9SFP2KpzIhe/6AS RKBBNy/MD2ZcW560yR8vusZYXPYpSi0Arbi53y4DiEceWCL48+ObGWAzH3KTWIVvV4/I ZMcfGIfEUPjeibBvZJa4Sjgfr7xuL+hTwnMss= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201109041346.14413.juan.guerrero@gmx.de> References: <201109041346 DOT 14413 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:15:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gcc difficulties on MSDOS 6.22 with LFN driver installed From: Ozkan Sezer To: Juan Manuel Guerrero Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p857Fghw032356 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote: > I still do not understand why DOSLFN 0.40e makes djgpp fail and why 0.40c does > not.  There is certainly an pending issue in DOSLFN.  Neitherless according to > DOSLFN documentation it does not support 0x71A6 at all.  filelength() should > check if the 0x71XX functions are supported by checking the value of ax. > This is done in other functions like _get_volume_info but has been forgotten > here. I wonder, though: Is something really gained by using 71a6 after along with many checks, as opposed to conventional 4201 ? -- O.S.