X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6193:: with SMTP id v141mr4877076qkb.94.1597219157554;
        Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:4af:: with SMTP id r15mr51689983ybs.32.1597219157326;
 Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.229.140.254; posting-account=7PG4OAoAAACvvfCLe0WmT87KJ-xE43vI
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.229.140.254
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <20ba1688-c59a-4bab-aa30-620f1b88c1ebo@googlegroups.com>
Subject: DJGPP for PC-9801/9821 target
From: "jpstmuk AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:59:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Bytes: 2021
Lines: 19
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 07C8FKtY007242
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hey folks,

I know there are some mentions of the NEC PC-98xx as a target in various bits of (very) old documentation, but wondered if there was anyone who could confirm whether this is still supported, or if it has bitrotted and become unsupported since it was introduced?

If you're not aware, the PC-98 was a range of "sort-of" PC compatibles by NEC in the mid-late 80's and early 90's in Japan. The older 9801 used NEC Vxx processors and the later 9821 used x86 (386, 486 and Pentium), they shared a few bits of PC-like peripherals and ran a slightly modified version of MS-DOS and Windows, but had completely different BIOS interface, interrupts, memory map, sound and graphics hardware. Just like regular PC's, they were also immensely popular for running games :)

Well behaved DOS applications can run on them, but at an absolute minimum they would need a different crt0 as an output target, but likely other things too.

I was wondering if this was still a viable target?