X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=/ha3cokv92f3XRQrjmAKl8Upztwz3Db1Ta6u1PUG6V8=; b=i89yw4+75djHcOpVsLu5uNmjTqRcsU3gB0EnfV13Fhw8tKlrweF/YmXN9IaaN6wxB0 In7kHxhOxOoM4jWzxPOT8KWeSFqcFdRh+zI0FW+TfNXuZCxKE74y/LPIo5TUkfXiaVCj edOKgu1jay3cnVa/VLbqHwsiwL1dz9azDx+mtKN5mfrM6Un5uS5Ez/QvqREQ5YN2FQDf 49b8DTdTBmCYMK3vJIO3YTMF4qry6AvvLR6FkyUUQT31Dn92FS2JRz5wi/vZ+dWy2UGw DngRsTagSDHCbq0HSVEAo1fkIf4d4BZOXuVrrEghdt2mR2v7o9Js0MXuorErwg3iHUOY Ni/Q== Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:31:50 +0400 From: Vladimir Zhbanov To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] Need some help with gsymcheck warning messages Message-ID: <20121008173150.GB27176@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com References: <5072321B DOT 5060406 AT twcny DOT rr DOT com> <20121008163144 DOT GA11303 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20121008100135 DOT 1ba5e93c AT svelte> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121008100135.1ba5e93c@svelte> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:01:35AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: > On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:31:44 +0400 > But won't it be unconventional and confusing, at the very least, > to have pins on the symbol that are also secretly connected to a > net? No, see below. > I have seen symbols with hidden power/ground pins, and symbols with > all pins visible, but never one where visible pins have a hidden > connection to a net. There is at least one very useful and widely used symbol: gnd-1.sym :) -- http://vzhbanov.byethost33.com