X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-help] Adding new gschem symbols? In-reply-to: <35CC5D35-73DC-42C5-91D1-D7F0DA3E3654@noqsi.com> References: <1349966191 DOT 2412 DOT 33 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <20121012100446 DOT 93D648096B1E AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20121013174902 DOT 160C98117B42 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20121016081200 DOT 587F08117B4C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <35CC5D35-73DC-42C5-91D1-D7F0DA3E3654 AT noqsi DOT com> Comments: In-reply-to John Doty message dated "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:14:18 -0600." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20121016210844.736D58117B51@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:08:44 +0200 (CEST) From: karl AT aspodata DOT se (Karl Hammar) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty: > On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:11 AM, Karl Hammar wrote: ... > Well, when I use gEDA, I do not have promiscuous settings for > library search. Indeed, for big projects, I've become fond of > the (reset-component-library) function. This allows me to have > complete control of the symbols a project uses. The browser then > only sees symbols in the project's controlled set. Ok, I understand that and see your point. > For broader search, I'll use a command line like "locate .sym | > grep -i diode". That finds just about every diode symbol on the > entire machine: standard gEDA, gedasymbols, and every gEDA > project I've worked on (over 10 years!). If I find what I need, > I can copy to one of the project's symbol directories. I'd probably do the same if I restricted myself to project local syms. ... > The problem with your idea is that it puts restrictions on the tools. ... The way I see my ideas is to allow optional extra fields in the "C" line. I don't understand in what way that would put any restrictions on the tools. Please explain. Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57