X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=OL/hR92cZzxVBSY76iTX4VJWd73Mmy/MDpQauX6xhOc=;
        b=aa0Y9kHnqbIs8/doOnjtJuORoiIFrRzx3z2av7wpeq2dv6ScQivWmZV2wy5X2EbI9p
         UPD0iN5GOECCV0nD+j1u+151SNwO/NRsUjEa9LQKMMIeSTjDiVf6sSZH+rCL7HLPlkQZ
         2anKKr5m3sTdaEBUJJ39TAx1QOQzzFbTLjb8M=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3a220e2814a25d46dfdaf4a4aef0542c@mail.theimps.com>
References: <3a220e2814a25d46dfdaf4a4aef0542c AT mail DOT theimps DOT com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:21:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOuGh89+wzDLW+QK2o3Tgt8cC8ROm2VVXbegQ5QsFu8nNOuWtg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Compiling gEDA/gaf with llvm/clang is supported
From: Bob Paddock <graceindustries AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc: geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> wrote:

> Just to confirm that compiling gEDA/gaf with clang is a supported
> configuration

Glad to hear.  I'm familiar with the philosophical differences between
GCC and CLANG,
 is there any functional reasons to prefer one over the other such as
run time speed of the program for example?