X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk designates 10.213.26.156 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.26.156; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk designates 10.213.26.156 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gareth AT edwardsfamily DOT org DOT uk X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ossDP5cUUR58MeLl6W8YVCr4xBQ5Jjchmek/ogcjX0M=; b=BZf2vZLWeL4sgyLnWh8krKbTL1wBdjaf+XB9mmqR3/E/uU3cX3mKJ0W8Eo8hM6V73N Im3xhCNc2hUDdDjPEYo6mE0DmgDlhTAO+5UMS+4F9bAH/luHVWV5f+PVIHvkfy7/x2E0 9sFsMEaAehrvVefhHLq8Nxk2byT/t9T8G7dIU= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [79.70.99.26] In-Reply-To: <4F3E33C4.9050009@unige.ch> References: <4F3E33C4 DOT 9050009 AT unige DOT ch> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:40:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] New geda release on Mageia 2 From: Gareth Edwards To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c45e83562e204b9390557 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9hepZhBGrkrZsQOOphnHWRM/8YNnVLR+EmUciWUZGhNsla35eNls+Z5gQduoygje1r0FZ Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --0015174c45e83562e204b9390557 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Juergen, Thanks for the effort on the packaging. On Friday, 17 February 2012, Juergen Harms wrote: > > One slightly anecdotic but annoying issue: all new packages brought to the > repositories need to pass formal checks by the rpmlint utility. Rpmlint > goes frenetic over the street address of FSF (Free Software Foundation), > and SFS happens to have moved recently. This address figures in the > copyright statements in practically all source packages. rpmlint issues an > error message for each of them. Can this be changed at geda? (I dont care > whether rpmlint is happy or not, but this "fog" of complaints about SFS > risks to hide small and possibly important error messages). Thanks! What address are you seeing and what do you expect to see? The first two files I checked (gschem/src/x_rc.c was the first) had the same address listed at http://www.fsf.org/about/contact/ Cheers Gareth > > Juergen > --0015174c45e83562e204b9390557 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Juergen,

Thanks for the effort on the packaging.
<= br>On Friday, 17 February 2012, Juergen Harms wrote:
One slightly anecdotic but annoying issue: all new packages brought to the = repositories need to pass formal checks by the rpmlint utility. Rpmlint goe= s frenetic over the street address of FSF (Free Software Foundation), and S= FS happens to have moved recently. This address figures in the copyright st= atements in practically all source packages. rpmlint issues an error messag= e for each of them. Can this be changed at geda? (I dont care whether rpmli= nt is happy or not, but this "fog" of complaints about SFS risks = to hide small and possibly important error messages). Thanks!

What address are you seeing and what do you expect to s= ee? The first two files I checked (gschem/src/x_rc.c was the first) had the= same address listed at

http://www.fsf.org/about/contact/

Cheers

Gareth=A0

Juergen
--0015174c45e83562e204b9390557--