X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.theimps.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
	shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
From: Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
To: Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
Cc: geda-admins AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net, geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net,
        geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] Re: git.geda-project.org permissions change
References: <87fvtffapt DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	<BEA3A8DC-904B-4C5A-A357-8867F94D2C05 AT jump-ing DOT de>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 22:39:32 +0100
In-Reply-To: <BEA3A8DC-904B-4C5A-A357-8867F94D2C05@jump-ing.de> (Markus
	Hitter's message of "Sun, 8 Sep 2013 22:10:48 +0200")
Message-ID: <871u4zc7sb.fsf_-_@harrington.peter-b.co.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

And the expected drama ensues... *sigh*

Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> writes:

> Am 08.09.2013 um 20:07 schrieb Peter TB Brett:
>
>> I've now changed the default git push policy for all repos on
>> geda-project.org:
>>
>> - @admins have the ability to git push and git push --force
>>
>> - Other developers have the ability to git push only.
>
> Does this apply to the pcb repo and all the branches in there, too?

Yes.  It's a change to the default setting; maintainers are welcome to
adopt different settings on a project-by-project basis.  In the case of
PCB, that would be DJ Delorie and/or Peter Clifton. [1]

> If yes, I consider this to be a severe privilege misuse and active
> prohibition of the workflow happening in the pcb repo for the last two
> years.

I'm very sorry to hear that you feel that way.

> If you're so keen on getting rid of me and my work, please be honest
> say so directly. Undoubtly you won't be able to force me into a less
> effective and more error-prone wrokflow just to satisfy your personal
> taste.

Who said anything about getting rid of you or your work?

Beruhige dich, bitte.

                                       Peter



[1] I notice that you decided *not* to quote the relevant part of my
original e-mail when you decided to whinge to geda-user:

Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> writes:
> This can be adjusted by specific projects' maintainers if they wish, in
> order to better suit the desired git workflow for their projects.

But I suppose that would have made it harder to shout, "Help, help, I'm
being oppressed!"

=2D-=20
Dr Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIs7pQACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpqJQQCfZLpElA+FOtCUeRzikJs29iJR
7ZMAnj3GdIuqYS3WaexXVaAt+V8U2qUh
=sVGl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--