X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=paKF577CjL+DaGWF3PPsES7hS5ZGpf1jLg3lBNu3KCA=; b=jxmI1L26VsJQVp5L2x6sTJw86acEOLx8Luhq+t5MI4vRtEiaXHyzb1tOqBBiWU6TD5 gkOrstmj3ZoqAuDXWD7ikiOwjIAyAme3+DEXncdk+riX49z6W5XaAtIRPnFVjZzhNrQy RM2eaqzdLwlhvbncWJ8xvbOWH/sD8NpNq+7MEIcckRCfVbhLfHJ0eJK07Z86hfLZtHco lqUgHQ/bmyrYM9u7nsW2IccqrEHXs7Zz7oVzFc3YlBLrVAnnFM5HEMJCf40XA2Ru6jGv 4LCJqsNtiQ3SoSb7l0zlFAmLX8wGo2ZfIdRzhXRZOkyN1fjgQWyzbeyouSpSYyp7Kkhi e6OA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.108.7 with SMTP id hg7mr6598635igb.37.1434003915364; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <218C63C4-B2B5-4DFB-A995-B170E7591B6F@noqsi.com> References: <20150608222056 DOT 10601 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <218C63C4-B2B5-4DFB-A995-B170E7591B6F AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:25:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Any news about FOSS EDA coordination? Import/export, common file format From: "timofonic timofonic (timofonic AT gmail DOT com)" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Cc: kicad-users AT yahoogroups DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122f998fb62630518380d39 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e0122f998fb62630518380d39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree about LaTeX, LO Writer has poor math support too. They thinked in average joe and forgot about hardcore geeks such as engineers. But EDA has a lot more specific niche, maybe it could be easier to give a consensus. OpenDocument issue is because Microsoft boycotted it with OOXML, impossible to implement properly because incomplete and cert messy documentation, it had too mant quirks. They implement OpenDocument in a buggy way, it's part of their monopoly strategy. More people complain about file formats... http://www.eevblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=3D43276.0 On Jun 10, 2015 6:34 PM, "John Doty" wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:53 PM, timofonic timofonic (timofonic AT gmail DOT com) < > geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > Something similar to OpenDocument but for electronics. > > > But OpenDocument is not universal: it doesn=E2=80=99t serve the LaTeX and= troff > communities. And geda-gaf, in particular, is well adapted to *automated* > data-product generation, like LaTeX but unlike the manual GUI tools that > use OpenDocument. Indeed, the makefiles for my LaTeX documents drag in da= ta > from geda-gaf. > > The other issue is that some parts of the flow are easier to standardize > and adapt than others. Netlists and BOMs are collections of simple > =E2=80=9Crelations" in database jargon. Translating to/from a standardize= d format > is a routine database manipulation job. But schematics and layouts are no= t > simple abstractions, and different tools encode them in fundamentally > different ways. > > There was once an effort to do this: EDIF. A lot of people and companies > put a lot of effort into it, and it failed. But an effort that concentrat= ed > on the feasible parts of the problem, netlists and BOMs, might succeed. > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > > http://www.noqsi.com/ > > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > --089e0122f998fb62630518380d39 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree about LaTeX, LO Writer has poor math support too. Th= ey thinked in average joe and forgot about hardcore geeks such as engineers= .

But EDA has a lot more specific niche, maybe it could be eas= ier to give a consensus.

OpenDocument issue is because Microsoft boycotted it with OO= XML, impossible to implement properly because incomplete and cert messy doc= umentation, it had too mant quirks. They implement OpenDocument in a buggy = way, it's part of their monopoly strategy.

More people complain about file formats...
http://w= ww.eevblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=3D43276.0

On Jun 10, 2015 6:34 PM, "John Doty" &= lt;jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:

On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:53 PM, timofonic timofonic (timofonic AT gmail DOT com)= <geda-user AT d= elorie.com> wrote:

Something similar to OpenDocument but = for electronics.

But OpenDocument is not = universal: it doesn=E2=80=99t serve the LaTeX and troff communities. And ge= da-gaf, in particular, is well adapted to *automated* data-product generati= on, like LaTeX but unlike the manual GUI tools that use OpenDocument. Indee= d, the makefiles for my LaTeX documents drag in data from geda-gaf.

The other issue is that some parts of the flow are easier= to standardize and adapt than others. Netlists and BOMs are collections of= simple =E2=80=9Crelations" in database jargon. Translating to/from a = standardized format is a routine database manipulation job. But schematics = and layouts are not simple abstractions, and different tools encode them in= fundamentally different ways.

There was once an e= ffort to do this: EDIF. A lot of people and companies put a lot of effort i= nto it, and it failed. But an effort that concentrated on the feasible part= s of the problem, netlists and BOMs, might succeed.

John Doty=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0<= /span>Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.

http://ww= w.noqsi.com/

jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--089e0122f998fb62630518380d39--