X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IavFTFFjGzSjxeXd2G2zAof0T0MQGkN2UOQAQDuVKz0=; b=TS5RIBh3UTcZCKzLsmU6i7ZoDXTC0RJkFRq5rZAJxx3fjujoqw53C1iSnEQFQUnB3O bLxh68lb79qh4StxScRLXZLRjygz59GueqstL5NgjB4+rj9Zk0i34gFWJJ8pZfvXFTRQ YeorabhwwJLL6FRRPm5sxorWoLBHwo9dCSpsFGldZjFIhKg7rKYYKn10ijB/8BSdfQrY BB0j7zGgM7ULdXz1Qn228G53jn5MZE5fjZ7p0lIlVCwYAmSwBdGde1twBkFN3O8jPX3C GE2+ZPfi21ms9b+FhbDCyijICKmfT3/sZmCyZOHsMRFEmupvAPWK2qxFOqSe6E/fi8Tj EYAA== X-Received: by 10.28.73.135 with SMTP id w129mr46356404wma.55.1451378764858; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:46:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:46:03 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of gschem) Message-Id: <20151229094603.782092b57563336883546bfd@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > My personal opinion, especially after actually hacking the code for back > annotation, is that there are design errors in the very core of gschem. > A few smallish things that makes life harder in probably most flows, > makes essential UI features impossible to implement. ... It would be good if you could bring the design erros forward.