X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9103FC26-EDF3-40BB-85BD-46CFB530D257"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] XML file format (what could be expected)
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20151230194212.312d35a02f7f667b8b1f92af@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:01:24 -0700
Message-Id: <E3505710-C2C7-4C07-8360-ADD4E6728AAF@noqsi.com>
References: <20151220120219 DOT c4644eef1a65b0eb2fb60d76 AT gmail DOT com> <20151220122659 DOT 378AF809D791 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20151220120219 DOT c4644eef1a65b0eb2fb60d76 AT gmail DOT com> <20151220125839 DOT 10228 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20151220133436 DOT 0B120809D791 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <0BA0A334-56C7-47B7-959F-C0131BED822C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151220173341 DOT fb4442a7816009e9f4e943b6 AT gmail DOT com> <20151230180007 DOT B4391809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20151230194212 DOT 312d35a02f7f667b8b1f92af AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_9103FC26-EDF3-40BB-85BD-46CFB530D257
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Dec 30, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Nicklas Karlsson =
(nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] =
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>>>> Neither gschem nor the schematic file format need any
>>>> modification to do this. It works nicely with SPICE. It=92s a
>>>> downstream issue.
>>=20
>> Ok, that is one way to do it. I meant more that I wanted gschem to
>> be able to show alt. the formula or the result, i.e. with the
>> parameter/formula applied.
>=20
> An annotation mechanism may be a solution if could be made without =
adding confusion.

It=92s tricky when you consider exporting hierarchical netlists rather =
that flattening. The netlisters have to understand either:

1. Substitution of the parameters in a flat netlist.

Or

2. Translation of the parameter syntax to that used downstream in a =
hierarchical netlist.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_9103FC26-EDF3-40BB-85BD-46CFB530D257
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=n2MQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_9103FC26-EDF3-40BB-85BD-46CFB530D257--