X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 11:28:35 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Sergey Alyoshin (alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] in Debian testing - why no emphasis on fork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 7 Jan 2017, Sergey Alyoshin (alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I am not proposing to add just "a fork" in package description. The similar > user interface and identical to gEDA pcb package description would be confusing > for new users. The new great appreciated features could have been denoted in > package description to ignite user interest. Thanks, I contacted the package maintainer about this, I'm sure we'll come up with a better description for the next packaging.