X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BPAgD7EqZY/wv01pZeGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1FhgQm?= =?us-ascii?q?NYZIPlTOCDCqFeAKCED8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYihCEAGEHQEBAQECATpPCxgJJQ8FG?= =?us-ascii?q?DETiWQHD68vD4NFi1UBAQEBBgEBAQEBHgWLO4J2hRKCMQWbf4ZwixqRE5MYHzi?= =?us-ascii?q?BACAUCCo9hkU/NQGGdYNBAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484002800"; d="scan'208";a="20814289" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:02:40 +0100 From: "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested Message-ID: <20170216210240.GB4487@visitor2.iram.es> References: <58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl> <81a247cf-13f8-404d-c314-3e92903245ef AT prochac DOT sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81a247cf-13f8-404d-c314-3e92903245ef@prochac.sk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 15.02.2017 20:45, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >Hello list members, > > > >It has been almost a month to this day that a new release of pcb > >was done. > > As I use version from git, I cannot answer these question. But it do > not see big changes there. Same here, I've been using git version since it exists, and CVS before. > > Now - when stable version is out - it is good time to think about > the plans for next release and maybe about some more significant > improvements. > > What about blind/buried vias? > > Milan > > > > >In this month there have been some 709 downloads of the tarball. > > > >What we active developers would like to have feedback on is: > > > >1) how many list members have downloaded the tarball ? > > > > (0 or +1 suffices) > > > >2) how many list members have tried to build an run the new > >version of pcb ? > > > > (0 or +1 suffices) > > > >3) what was your user experience ? (what went good, what went bad, > >what was the first impression after test driving, etc.). > > > > (you can put the whole rant here ;-) > > > > > > > >If you didn't download the tarball you can do that from: > > > >https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-4.0.0/ > > > > > >We hope to here from you soon ;-) > > > >Thanks in advance and with kind regards, > > > >Bert Timmerman > > > >