X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OKAGBEjHaahoiWts1zAXitWJImBvixizvWtVOo/JaYw=; b=CUq1i5zBQiwuLbqpy8xqEWVTOrQix6VRKgc/l5ZoewpB1Z8P7S1OXkEeuASu4Nzb6V 7LezJnzGXaSI+ohl8GZDk8DUE54QI7BEupvpcU8DBCe98efH3uAycQK1HTgWfzpgtuf7 o4CQj+t1w54YumK4wi4FtWuQqBbu0uzOVD+fGEPcXD1not9kbvf+S8+gXU4BrekXQOPz e9VXK1FnN66kRuWndP4l+f6djwHjNr0+LpPeqgloboPpKiTxjX8iS857/ijpoahg8sHK l0SIkaAYnRBY7N/9aztrfAYxnqdGGqCwxivBvu7ZfxIvFPA96b9/Oaf69/Eb661yNYXd oxrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OKAGBEjHaahoiWts1zAXitWJImBvixizvWtVOo/JaYw=; b=AtwmyaKLW7UAA1qh4Uw36nX9UrUXQs3q9Aaps0fkkFZI4YOmZGzUx2Bjv1+NKxtu9c FahkkwVIXK0NG3TBb606YSneGx2Gmb+cV47HgFvknZh/esGdtLAuvDGNqIjXciqvWiiM Z64htZ3537sQd1xiKj6EFuNsJ7z9nSFxtp9WemroTuJd3XU00pstaA6ao6cBj+W1RpD1 R308MEtYjen2d7zFXU+5Ak2iT7U+UHYq2SvJeUs8CPl1o4DQWWKNy00efk4tkTj1bBjp pSzNuCbgPDNvA9I45dGbUmLQE6n6eoSpxeVoC5nIA0qtPYqppE6HAqZ/ervuZqhU1GLv jAvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxjjiLxmaGDe2nhyB2Qoel0CHAyDsuaqwIcqEcaFfCFyqeKSKgf aDvvm1l/8FN6r6QT X-Received: by 10.25.17.155 with SMTP id 27mr15686830lfr.129.1499354060768; Thu, 06 Jul 2017 08:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 17:14:16 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Refdes= mangling Message-Id: <20170706171416.7d9acaaf7d2c044178a4dea4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Hi, fellow gEDA users, > > ... > > Now, one of my ideas is to move mangling of hierarchy related > attributes to the post-processing stage in order to process schematic > pages and subpages separately, creating isolated subcircuits first. Sounds reasonable, only problem with name hierarchical name is they get to long to fit on circuit board. > After some time of thinking, I realise the use cases when net= is > mangled or not. The former case is for subcircuits that share their > power sources, the latter is for such cases where such power sources > are would-be-isolated within the subschematics. If alias is possible I think it is a good idea to use for old or new name? > Are there use cases where it is OK to use refdes= without mangling in > flattened hierarchical schematic netlist? I see only a field for > various potential conflicts... > > Thank you, > Vladimir > > [1] https://github.com/lepton-eda/lepton-eda/pull/139 Not related but I think there is a problem with lowercase letters in gnetlist and maybe space for net names then, at least then using them in pcb they do now show up in list of known nets.