X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20120118093353.10720.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:33:53 +0100
From: Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Ko=C5=9Bciuszkiewicz?= <k DOT kosciuszkiewicz AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] BUG: disappearing dots in gschem
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Ko=C5=9Bciuszkiewicz?= <k DOT kosciuszkiewicz AT gmail DOT com>
References: <20120118090450 DOT GB28925 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120118090450.GB28925@visitor2.iram.es>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> gschem: skip drawing endpoint cues on fully connected nets.
> 
> Affects-bug: lp-707064
> 
> causes some dots to disappear.

I too think this is a problem.

Keep in mind that there are different types of dots.

Recently there was a report about an unconnected net, which also
lost it's endpoint cue.


What gives? Krzysztof, maybe you can talk a little about the theory
behind the change?


Thanks

//Peter