X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=3UZe/vQYodoFnKBi/kNo3gycN17xDzWwgjDeRe/l4W0=;
        b=lRJCvOS7kbz3POggMXI26Z2bNhIvx/vu/enNyuROjTD0tdq9Z8DOdPeQJjlMSn6IA4
         y5HN/N16VJ8UHcCEV/4h19iTjZhmrPrFWvOsAgTz+LvT6QdIaTx9p66QnA70Ol7FveW4
         T735/8MNjABdLWWns5hw/bSnNYJYDfAfu7BrY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120118105942.GA10816@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <20120118090450 DOT GB28925 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<20120118093353 DOT 10720 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAJisMU2b9O5pq3KTTbAMYdy8ZnkQh6m0kC3rwU1AjfrR7uL-Kw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20120118105942 DOT GA10816 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:41:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJisMU0RF-6LPTZhCtuF_GFO-J=fkqtQUTFuV3z78N-M7iXbow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] BUG: disappearing dots in gschem
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Ko=C5=9Bciuszkiewicz?= <k DOT kosciuszkiewicz AT gmail DOT com>
To: Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
Cc: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q0INfoDR027203
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

W dniu 18 stycznia 2012 11:59 użytkownik Gabriel Paubert
<paubert AT iram DOT es> napisał:

> Correct. The dots only seem to appear in the middle of segments, but
> not when you have a mix of pins and net segments. And, as far as I remember
> there was never a dot when three pins coincide, which may happen fairly
> frequently in passive circuits as shown in the new attachments; these do
> not cover all the cases, since up to 4 pins/segments may coincide easily,
> and more if you use non horizontal/vertical net segments or, shudder, pins.

The fix for the issue is now in git HEAD. I have also fixed the case
of junction dots on connections where only pins are involved without
net segments.

Best regards,
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz