X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 23:38:07 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Lutz To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] undefined symbol: scm_is_exact_integer In-Reply-To: <20191129212159.7112980395B9@turkos.aspodata.se> Message-ID: References: <20191129212159 DOT 7112980395B9 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, 29 Nov 2019, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: > So you should either not use that function, or require at least guile > v2.0.10. That's correct; I'll set the minimum requirement to Guile 2.0.10. Thank you for your feedback! I'm a bit unsure how to proceed about minimum required versions. Since I don't have an easy way to test gEDA/gaf with older dependency versions, I don't notice if something breaks unless someone tells me. One option would be requiring at least the versions shipped in Debian oldstable. This is the oldest distribution on which I regularly build gEDA/gaf, and considering the overall conservativeness of Debian, these should be reasonable minimum versions to expect. What do you think?