ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/03/15/08:02:46

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: "Alexandre Oliva" <oliva AT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br>,
<cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <autoconf AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: updated win32 macro
References: <035401c0ac91$3ba21fd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<022001c0accf$29b724d0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<orelvz60mr DOT fsf AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br>
<007f01c0ad2e$f3dc5d20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<00a301c0ad32$57ad0220$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<mv4elvz5pma DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
<00c801c0ad36$01ec3370$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<mv466hb5ohw DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
<011a01c0ad41$c0fbc9a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<mv4snkf43ot DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
<01b801c0ad4b$9b2f1380$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<mv4k85r42vu DOT fsf AT nostromo DOT lrde DOT epita DOT fr>
<01c401c0ad4c$7e469ad0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
From: Akim Demaille <akim AT epita DOT fr>
Date: 15 Mar 2001 14:05:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <01c401c0ad4c$7e469ad0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
Message-ID: <mv4bsr341z1.fsf@nostromo.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> writes:

>> Then there is yet another thing to introduce IMHO, AC_SYS_WIN32 or
>> so, which does define this symbol to yes/no.  You high level macro
>> ac_requires it.

Robert> Doesn't that just check the _current_ support ?

Sorry, I don't understand.

Is the feature your trying to test related to the compiler, or to the
system?  If the language is relevant, then indeed AC_SYS is wrong.  If
the language is not, then I don't understand your sentence: all that
matters is whether we are running this system or not, to decide, for
instance, of the programs to compile.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019