ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/09/22/12:02:36

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:03:08 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function attributes
Message-ID: <20010922120308.B1668@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010921220557 DOT A30584 AT redhat DOT com> <20010922060733 DOT 57688 DOT qmail AT web14510 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20010922060733.57688.qmail@web14510.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:07:33PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2001
>at 12:49:50PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
>> >Joseph's patch is here:
>> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-09/msg00774.html
>> >
>> >I will start on this. Any interest in backport to 3.0.1, or should I
>> >just target 3.1?  I'm hoping it may solve some of the other
>> attribute
>> >problems (stdcall and dllimport) in C++ classes with 3.0.1. 
>> Can you build the trunk version of gcc, Danny?
>Yes. 3-stage bootstrap with mingw as gcc with cygwin utils. 
> I have made only a few changes.  One having to do with b**dy anonymous
>unions (again) in w32api (needed for threads)
>/* "The member specification of anonymous unions shall only
> define  non-static data members"  saith the Standard */
>Two anon unions in w32api aren't compliant. I will clean that up and
>put in w32api cvs

I've seen the errors but I don't understand why the data members are
considered "static".  Weren't they just array references?

>Another I sent to Joseph (see below).  
>The rest were litle bits for libstdc++ (no SIGTRAP) or changes in
>mingw32.h to override the cygwin directory specs.

Do you want me to update mingw32.h in the gcc.gnu.org repository?

>I have since put in Donn Terrys native-struct patches and they seem to
>work okay.  
>Now (take deep breath) to attack the dll stuff .

Do you have these patches available somewhere, by any chance?  I'd like
to try applying them to my sandbox to see if it allows me to compile
things.  Your changes below didn't do the trick for me, unfortunately.


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019