ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/11/10/23:53:17

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <014601c16a6c$fb1dc910$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20011111032226 DOT GA21492 AT redhat DOT com> <3BEDFD26 DOT 7060806 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011111043034 DOT GA22375 AT redhat DOT com> <013301c16a6a$90e52ae0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011111044025 DOT GB22496 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: Move zlib up one level?
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:54:43 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 05:00:38.0591 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE29CCF0:01C16A6D]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Move zlib up one level?

> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 03:37:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> >
> >
> >> >Yeah, but isn't cygcheck a cygwin1.dll application?
> >> The only problem is that I had to pull a lot of code out of
> >
> >Not good.. particularly with the amount of changes I'm accruing in
> >at the moment.
> You're not planning on changing any of the files in /etc/setup are
> That would be a bad thing(TM).

Not directly or immediately. And certainly any changes I do suggest will
be done in a backward compatible fashion..

There are some things I believe we should be able to do with
1) Detect cross-package conflicts. Say foo and bar both contain
2) The lst files are currently gz' files, I think it would be good to
change to using bz2 in the future.

Doing the 1st one really requires a more database orientated approach --
long term of course.

> Also, since I wrote most (all?) of what I'm pulling out, I felt pretty
> comfortable with it...

Oh, sure :}. I wasn't meaning you weren't capable, just that having the
same code in two places is bad because of the capability for skew.


- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019