Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2002/02/16/07:49:18
Well, 11K (i.e. 2 seconds download at 56Kbit) is neither here nor there.
100K is more of an issue.
Anyway, Chris' response (AFAICT) implied that the size was not an issue,
but cross-compilability was.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: RE: setup w/char* eliminated is big
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
> > [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Pavel Tsekov
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:05 AM
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Ok,
> > > finally got some breathing time.
> > >
> > > Setup with char * eliminated is ~350K. Ouch.
> > >
> > > This is why I've not committed my patch yet (I've been trying to
> > > *where* the extra 100K appeared from).
> > You have four 'inline' - I know they're small in size, but three of
> > are the most commonly used methods (the default and the copy
> > and also the 'operator ='). Remove the 'inline' modifier and see if
> > executable gets smaller.
> Done and done:
> CVS + "For the curious" patch + Two subsequent patches from Michael
> 355840 bytes.
> Above with all inlines "un-inlined" == 344576 bytes.
> So a bit over 11KB saved. In my judgement that's enough to warrant
> inlines; if string-handling speed is a significant factor for
setup.exe I'd say
> there's something wrong somewhere that no amount of inlines could
> Gary R. Van Sickle
> Brewer. Patriot.
- Raw text -