ftp.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Earnie Boyd wrote: > So, I would like to see /usr/netpbm/bin. But I don't want to go all-out on the "separate package tree" idea. NO: /usr/netpbm/bin /usr/netpbm/lib /usr/netpbm/include /usr/netpbm/man /usr/netpbm/info Blech! YES: /usr/bin/netpbm/ << the only special case /usr/lib/ /usr/include/ /usr/man/ /usr/info/ XFree86 has a long history of a fully separate tree, and autoconf macros and suchlike have dealt with it for a long time. OTOH, netpbm has no such history (e.g. where to look for pbm.h? where to look for libpgm.a?) so development files should go in the "normal" place. But everything in the "normal" place under /usr/[lib,include,man], except for binaries in /usr/netpbm/bin/ ? That just offends my sense of aesthetics... Besides, we already have a history of /usr/bin/*/ that predates any of the mandates on http://www.cygwin.com/setup.html : ncurses-test-dll/ etc. --Chuck
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |