To:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT new-orleans DOT neosoft DOT com>
Cc:	Martin AT snsystems DOT co DOT uk, djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Subject:	Re: Disk I/O rates with DJGPP
Date:	Mon, 07 Nov 94 08:54:56 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>

>> What I would like to point out is that performance penalty for using
>> DJGPP is really not so bad.  (27 seconds vs 16 seconds)
>
> Well, I disagree.  It's like taking that nice new high speed SCSI drive
> and turning it into an MFM drive when running under DJGPP.  That's why

For the person who actually tries to squeeze maximum performance from
DJGPP I would expect you to disagree.  However, this SCSI -> MFM thing
is a great, *great*, GREAT exaggeration.  And I did mention that we
indeed should make I/O faster.  I do maintain, though, that 10 more
seconds is not such a long time to wait, even if you just bought this
great ACME SCSI-II drive...

- Raw text -